
Background and Context
Research Focus
This study examines how bank complexity through international operations affects systemic risk in European banks before, during, and after the 2008-2009 global financial crisis and 2010-2011 European sovereign debt crisis.
Data Sample
Analysis covers 105 publicly traded banks from 15 European countries over 2005-2013, using hand-collected data on banks' foreign subsidiaries and branch networks.
Methodology
The study measures bank complexity through organizational structure (subsidiaries/branches) and geographic dispersion, while systemic risk is assessed through multiple metrics including MES, SRISK, and ΔCoVaR.
Decline in Foreign Subsidiaries During Crisis Periods
- Shows dramatic decline in foreign subsidiaries from 1,838 pre-crisis to 484 post-crisis
- Demonstrates significant retrenchment in international banking operations
- Reflects banks' strategic response to financial crisis pressures
Geographic Distribution of Foreign Subsidiaries by Region (2011-2013)
- European banks maintain strongest presence in their home region
- North America represents second largest concentration of subsidiaries
- Shows uneven global distribution of banking operations
Impact of Complexity on Systemic Risk Across Time Periods
- Shows significant increase in systemic risk during crisis periods
- Risk levels remained elevated post-crisis
- Demonstrates lasting impact of financial crisis on bank stability
Bank Size Effect on Complexity-Risk Relationship
- Large banks show significantly higher systemic risk during crisis
- Size amplifies the relationship between complexity and risk
- Demonstrates importance of bank size in systemic risk assessment
Geographic Complexity Impact on Bank Stability
- Banks operating both subsidiaries and branches show highest complexity
- Branch-only operations demonstrate lowest complexity levels
- Reveals relationship between organizational structure and complexity
Contribution and Implications
- Bank complexity reduces systemic risk during normal times but increases it during financial crises
- The findings support implementation of systemic risk-based capital buffers for complex banks
- Results suggest need for differentiated regulatory approaches based on bank size and organizational structure
Data Sources
- Subsidiaries trend chart: Based on Table 1 showing evolution of foreign subsidiaries
- Regional distribution chart: Based on Table 2 showing geographic distribution of subsidiaries
- Systemic risk chart: Based on Table 3 showing MES statistics across periods
- Size effect chart: Based on Table 7 showing differential effects by bank size
- Complexity impact chart: Based on Table C1 showing organizational structure statistics